The New York Times The New York Times Magazine Give the gift of
Times News Tracker

 

NYTimes: Home - Site Index - Archive - Help

Welcome, mjmccready1 - Member Center - Log Out
Site Search:  


Advertisement




NYT Store
The New York Times Essential Library - JAZZThe New York Times Essential Library - JAZZ
Price: $16. Learn More.






Palm Beach Island, FL
This home will allow you to enjoy views that encompass a nearby wildlife refuge and a wide stretch of sparkling waterway.

Search for this any many other dream homes in Florida at realestate.nytimes.com.


Hit Song Science

By CLIVE THOMPSON

Published: December 14, 2003

ARTICLE TOOLS
Email This Article E-Mail This Article
Printer Friendly Format Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-mailed Articles Most E-Mailed Articles

TIMES NEWS TRACKER

  Topics

Alerts
Music


Science and Technology


Recordings (Audio)



When Norah Jones released her first album, she was a long shot at best. ''Come Away With Me'' was filled with mellow, sultry tunes -- precisely the opposite of the histrionic diva pop crowding the charts. Virtually no one expected Jones to score a major hit.

No one, that is, except for a piece of artificial intelligence called Hit Song Science, a program that tries to determine, with mathematical precision, whether a song is going to be a Top 40 hit. When the scientists fed Jones's album into that computer, alarm bells went off: the program predicted that eight tracks would hit the charts. ''We were like, whoa, that's funky,'' says Mike McCready, the C.E.O. of Polyphonic HMI, the Barcelona-based company that developed the software application. A few months later, Jones's album went multiplatinum -- and Hit Song Science had proved it could pick a hit as well as Clive Davis.

But how? At the heart of the program is a ''clustering'' algorithm that locates acoustic similarities between songs, like common bits of rhythm, harmonies or keys. The software takes a new tune and compares it with the mathematical signatures of the last 30 years of Top 40 hits. The closer the song is to ''a hit cluster,'' the more likely -- in theory -- that the kids won't be able to resist it. Yet the weird thing is, songs that are mathematically similar don't necessarily sound the same. The scientists found that U2 is similar to Beethoven, and that Van Halen shares qualities with the piano rock of Vanessa Carlton. Even more bizarrely, 50 Cent's throbbing rap tune ''If I Can't'' correlates with ''(There's) No Gettin' Over Me,'' a twangy country ditty by Ronnie Milsap.

This year, several record companies began using Hit Song Science to help pick which songs on an album to promote. Others are now using it in the studio, taking a rough mix of a new song, checking to see how hit-worthy it is, then tweaking it until it has ''good mathematics,'' as McCready puts it. He can foresee a day when most major hits will have been vetted by algorithms.

Which is, depending on how you look at it, either a wonderful breakthrough for science or an incredibly bleak statement about the music industry. Critics for years have complained that record labels produce only bland albums that mimic what's already popular. But Hit Song Science takes that trend to its logical absurdity: it does not merely aim at the middle of the road -- it calculates it, with scientific precision.


Get home delivery of The Times from $2.90/week




RELATED ARTICLES
. FAMILY FARE  (October 17, 2003)  $
. Footlights  (November 13, 2002)  $
. Hear the One About the Teacher Shortage?  (September 16, 2001)  $
. Music and Science Meet on a Piano Bench  (February 13, 2001)  $
Find more results for Music and Science and Technology

TOP MAGAZINE ARTICLES
. The Dean Connection
. Pakistan Is ...
. When Political Art Mattered
. The Way We Live Now: The Feeling Is Not Mutual
Go to Magazine

OUR ADVERTISERS
Whats Your IQ?

Click for exclusive RX 330 information kit

$7 Online Trades
at Scottrade